Comments on: How Many Cooks Does it Take to Define a PHR Functional Model? http://chilmarkresearch.com/2008/03/25/too-many-cooks-or-how-many-orgs-to-define-a-phr/ Providing perspective on key IT trends in the healthcare sector Thu, 09 Feb 2012 23:01:44 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: Finally, Dossia Goes Live « Chilmark Research http://chilmarkresearch.com/2008/03/25/too-many-cooks-or-how-many-orgs-to-define-a-phr/#comment-1474 Wed, 01 Oct 2008 23:17:15 +0000 http://hitanalyst.wordpress.com/?p=158#comment-1474 [...] data if they should switch heath plans. (Note: health plans claim they can now do this via the AHIP tech standards released last summer, but to date, none have actually done it.) Beyond that though, don’t see much else and this is [...]

]]> By: Academics and PHRs: RWJ’s Project HealthDesign Rolls Out the Carpet « Chilmark Research http://chilmarkresearch.com/2008/03/25/too-many-cooks-or-how-many-orgs-to-define-a-phr/#comment-1454 Tue, 23 Sep 2008 15:19:04 +0000 http://hitanalyst.wordpress.com/?p=158#comment-1454 [...] using and announced at roughly the same time, so here was one small confusing step made, at least confusing for me making me wonder if they RWJ was out-of-touch. Now they created a Common Platform construct that is [...]

]]> By: Lygeia Ricciardi http://chilmarkresearch.com/2008/03/25/too-many-cooks-or-how-many-orgs-to-define-a-phr/#comment-630 Mon, 07 Apr 2008 17:28:19 +0000 http://hitanalyst.wordpress.com/?p=158#comment-630 John —

Thanks for highlighting (and questioning the relevance of) several similar efforts in the PHR functional requirements definition area. In response in part to your question on the Project HealthDesign blog, I posted a longer reply about how that effort differs from HL7′s in its objectives, methods, and scope — despite seeming fairly similar on the surface. See http://projecthealthdesign.typepad.com/project_health_design/2008/03/index.html

While I don’t dispute that even more and better communication among such efforts is a good thing, a fair amount of it is already taking place. And, given the unpredictability of the PHR field’s evolution, I think there is some value in having numerous related efforts that can challenge and improve each other. (Another colleague of ours in the health IT blogosphere–Steve Beller–also makes that point in comments on my original post.)

Looking forward to reading your PHR report.

- Lygeia Ricciardi
http://projecthealthdesign.typepad.com/project_health_design/

]]> By: John http://chilmarkresearch.com/2008/03/25/too-many-cooks-or-how-many-orgs-to-define-a-phr/#comment-611 Thu, 27 Mar 2008 19:10:58 +0000 http://hitanalyst.wordpress.com/?p=158#comment-611 Hello John,
PHR report will be released in April. I have updated the “Research” page providing further details on the report.

]]> By: J Halvorson http://chilmarkresearch.com/2008/03/25/too-many-cooks-or-how-many-orgs-to-define-a-phr/#comment-610 Wed, 26 Mar 2008 13:25:46 +0000 http://hitanalyst.wordpress.com/?p=158#comment-610 John,

I couldn’t find your email. When is your PHR report coming out, and is it possible to pre-order?

]]> By: ICMCC Articles » Blog Archive » Too Many Cooks? or How Many Orgs to Define a PHR? http://chilmarkresearch.com/2008/03/25/too-many-cooks-or-how-many-orgs-to-define-a-phr/#comment-609 Wed, 26 Mar 2008 06:56:14 +0000 http://hitanalyst.wordpress.com/?p=158#comment-609 [...] maybe insurer, next of kin, home address and some basic biometric data – you get the idea.” Article John Moore, Chilmark Research, 25 March [...]

]]>