<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CCHIT Goes After PHRs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chilmarkresearch.com/2008/06/10/cchit-goes-after-phrs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chilmarkresearch.com/2008/06/10/cchit-goes-after-phrs/</link>
	<description>Providing perspective on key IT trends in the healthcare sector</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 06:41:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: CCHIT PHR Draft Released for Comment &#171; Chilmark Research</title>
		<link>http://chilmarkresearch.com/2008/06/10/cchit-goes-after-phrs/#comment-1469</link>
		<dc:creator>CCHIT PHR Draft Released for Comment &#171; Chilmark Research</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 21:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hitanalyst.wordpress.com/?p=233#comment-1469</guid>
		<description>[...] the CCHIT released the draft (warning PDF) for PHR certification for public comment.  I have never been a fan of this effort by CCHIT as the PHR market is simply too immature for any prescriptive certification [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the CCHIT released the draft (warning PDF) for PHR certification for public comment.  I have never been a fan of this effort by CCHIT as the PHR market is simply too immature for any prescriptive certification [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PHR Certification Looking for Input &#171; Chilmark Research</title>
		<link>http://chilmarkresearch.com/2008/06/10/cchit-goes-after-phrs/#comment-1441</link>
		<dc:creator>PHR Certification Looking for Input &#171; Chilmark Research</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 21:37:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hitanalyst.wordpress.com/?p=233#comment-1441</guid>
		<description>[...] 19, 2008 by John    Now, I am no fan of the whole CCHIT initiative to develop a certification process for PHRs as this market is far too immature.  But continue on [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 19, 2008 by John    Now, I am no fan of the whole CCHIT initiative to develop a certification process for PHRs as this market is far too immature.  But continue on [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CCHIT Goes After PHRs &#171; Chilmark Research &#124; Ted Eytan, MD</title>
		<link>http://chilmarkresearch.com/2008/06/10/cchit-goes-after-phrs/#comment-791</link>
		<dc:creator>CCHIT Goes After PHRs &#171; Chilmark Research &#124; Ted Eytan, MD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 21:46:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hitanalyst.wordpress.com/?p=233#comment-791</guid>
		<description>[...] CCHIT Goes After PHRs &#171; Chilmark Research - commentary on PHR certification process [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] CCHIT Goes After PHRs &laquo; Chilmark Research &#8211; commentary on PHR certification process [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
