<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PHR Market: Analysis &amp; Trends</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chilmarkresearch.com/2008/06/17/phr-market-analysis-trends/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chilmarkresearch.com/2008/06/17/phr-market-analysis-trends/</link>
	<description>Providing perspective on key IT trends in the healthcare sector</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 23:01:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://chilmarkresearch.com/2008/06/17/phr-market-analysis-trends/#comment-794</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 12:58:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hitanalyst.wordpress.com/?p=245#comment-794</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good questions JD which I&#039;ll answer in order:

1) When we performed the survey we asked vendors which market was the primary market they were targeting i.e., where were they devoting the majority of their product development (each market has slightly different needs), marketing and sales efforts.  We then went on to ask which market was secondary.

2) The percentages represent the percentage of iPHR vendors surveyed (iPHR is a Web-native PHR solution that can enable portability) targeting each specific market.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good questions JD which I&#8217;ll answer in order:</p>
<p>1) When we performed the survey we asked vendors which market was the primary market they were targeting i.e., where were they devoting the majority of their product development (each market has slightly different needs), marketing and sales efforts.  We then went on to ask which market was secondary.</p>
<p>2) The percentages represent the percentage of iPHR vendors surveyed (iPHR is a Web-native PHR solution that can enable portability) targeting each specific market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jd</title>
		<link>http://chilmarkresearch.com/2008/06/17/phr-market-analysis-trends/#comment-793</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jd]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 04:17:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hitanalyst.wordpress.com/?p=245#comment-793</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Very nice presentation. A few questions:

How are you distinguishing the primary and secondary markets for PHRs? Also, when you give percentages, it&#039;s not clear whether you are counting the number of PHR vendors/sponsors or the number of PHR users. Is it sometimes one and sometimes the other?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very nice presentation. A few questions:</p>
<p>How are you distinguishing the primary and secondary markets for PHRs? Also, when you give percentages, it&#8217;s not clear whether you are counting the number of PHR vendors/sponsors or the number of PHR users. Is it sometimes one and sometimes the other?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

