<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Covisint Leverages Mfg Infrastructure for Healthcare</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chilmarkresearch.com/2008/07/21/covisint-leverages-mfg-infrastructure-for-healthcare/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chilmarkresearch.com/2008/07/21/covisint-leverages-mfg-infrastructure-for-healthcare/</link>
	<description>Providing perspective on key IT trends in the healthcare sector</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 23:01:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lincoln Nguyen</title>
		<link>http://chilmarkresearch.com/2008/07/21/covisint-leverages-mfg-infrastructure-for-healthcare/#comment-4013</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lincoln Nguyen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 16:20:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hitanalyst.wordpress.com/?p=304#comment-4013</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;ll be interesting to see what business models these HIEs come up with .]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;ll be interesting to see what business models these HIEs come up with .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Covisint Jumps onto PaaS Bandwagon &#171; Chilmark Research</title>
		<link>http://chilmarkresearch.com/2008/07/21/covisint-leverages-mfg-infrastructure-for-healthcare/#comment-4008</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Covisint Jumps onto PaaS Bandwagon &#171; Chilmark Research]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 01:18:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hitanalyst.wordpress.com/?p=304#comment-4008</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] was Covisint, who announced their AppCloud last week.  (for more background on Covisint, see the piece we wrote over a year ago) written We had a briefing with Covisint late last week and Covisint was kind enough to send us [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] was Covisint, who announced their AppCloud last week.  (for more background on Covisint, see the piece we wrote over a year ago) written We had a briefing with Covisint late last week and Covisint was kind enough to send us [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Inquiring Mind</title>
		<link>http://chilmarkresearch.com/2008/07/21/covisint-leverages-mfg-infrastructure-for-healthcare/#comment-1014</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Inquiring Mind]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 13:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hitanalyst.wordpress.com/?p=304#comment-1014</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If their platform was so good in the auto industry, why did they sell it and GM express skepticism about rolling it out? 

http://www.purchasing.com/article/CA388199.html

http://www.networkworld.com/news/2004/0205covisint.html

If the auto industry, with more technical sophistication couldn&#039;t work past the competitive issues, especially where real stockholder monitored dollars are involved, why would health care be able to set aside competition and utilize the tool? This is a rebranded private RHIO with no sustainable business model. As you state, a physician office is hard pressed to afford this, so a hospital is to pay for it? Their prospects are not so great in a challenged economy and they have their own plant, property and equipment investments to make. Sure, a payer could afford to do this, but this would cut into their profits at what benefit in a measurable period of time.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If their platform was so good in the auto industry, why did they sell it and GM express skepticism about rolling it out? </p>
<p><a href="http://www.purchasing.com/article/CA388199.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.purchasing.com/article/CA388199.html</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.networkworld.com/news/2004/0205covisint.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.networkworld.com/news/2004/0205covisint.html</a></p>
<p>If the auto industry, with more technical sophistication couldn&#8217;t work past the competitive issues, especially where real stockholder monitored dollars are involved, why would health care be able to set aside competition and utilize the tool? This is a rebranded private RHIO with no sustainable business model. As you state, a physician office is hard pressed to afford this, so a hospital is to pay for it? Their prospects are not so great in a challenged economy and they have their own plant, property and equipment investments to make. Sure, a payer could afford to do this, but this would cut into their profits at what benefit in a measurable period of time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

