<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: USB Thumb-drives: Just a Bad Idea for PHRs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chilmarkresearch.com/2008/08/26/usb-thumb-drives-just-a-bad-idea-for-phrs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chilmarkresearch.com/2008/08/26/usb-thumb-drives-just-a-bad-idea-for-phrs/</link>
	<description>Providing perspective on key IT trends in the healthcare sector</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 23:01:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: michael</title>
		<link>http://chilmarkresearch.com/2008/08/26/usb-thumb-drives-just-a-bad-idea-for-phrs/#comment-2632</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[michael]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 03:41:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hitanalyst.wordpress.com/?p=411#comment-2632</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The problem identified in the report is not USB devices per-se, but that fact that the use of the particular devices examined *requires* running software included on the device to view the data stored on the device.

Thus, the vulnerability is due to running potentially untrustworthy software.  If. instead.

Such a vulnerability should not exist if the USB device is merely a thumb drive used for transferring data from one system to another.  (Assuming of course that these systems take the essential security steps of disabling auto-run.)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem identified in the report is not USB devices per-se, but that fact that the use of the particular devices examined *requires* running software included on the device to view the data stored on the device.</p>
<p>Thus, the vulnerability is due to running potentially untrustworthy software.  If. instead.</p>
<p>Such a vulnerability should not exist if the USB device is merely a thumb drive used for transferring data from one system to another.  (Assuming of course that these systems take the essential security steps of disabling auto-run.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: misstrade</title>
		<link>http://chilmarkresearch.com/2008/08/26/usb-thumb-drives-just-a-bad-idea-for-phrs/#comment-1263</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[misstrade]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 23:22:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hitanalyst.wordpress.com/?p=411#comment-1263</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[However Biometric Proximity Based Technologies make total sense. Coming very soon to a PHR near you!
www.proxense.com

Write me if you would like to talk

mdavio@proxense.com]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>However Biometric Proximity Based Technologies make total sense. Coming very soon to a PHR near you!<br />
<a href="http://www.proxense.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.proxense.com</a></p>
<p>Write me if you would like to talk</p>
<p><a href="mailto:mdavio@proxense.com">mdavio@proxense.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

