<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: HIT Part of Stimulus Package, Rumor $25B</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chilmarkresearch.com/2009/01/05/hit-part-of-stimulus-package-rumor-25b/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chilmarkresearch.com/2009/01/05/hit-part-of-stimulus-package-rumor-25b/</link>
	<description>Providing perspective on key IT trends in the healthcare sector</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2012 23:53:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://chilmarkresearch.com/2009/01/05/hit-part-of-stimulus-package-rumor-25b/#comment-1785</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 00:53:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chilmarkresearch.com/?p=1041#comment-1785</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well Vince, that little piece of trivia slipped by me.  HIMSS must be smiling @ least until we see the details.

Alex,
According to my calculations, $25B buys a hell of a lot of EMR seats.  If we assume an EMR license goes for the ave price of $30K, that $25B buys us over 800K licenses.  Seeing as we have ~650K practicing physicians, we&#039;ll have more than enough to go around.

And Vendors Win,
You&#039;re spot on, payers and vendors make out like bandits without some realignment of incentives for physicians.  Then there is the whole issue of whether or not HIT will make a damn bit of difference to escalating healthcare costs. Nominal impact at best.

But it sure is sexy to say things like healthcare IT, cloud computing and SOA!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well Vince, that little piece of trivia slipped by me.  HIMSS must be smiling @ least until we see the details.</p>
<p>Alex,<br />
According to my calculations, $25B buys a hell of a lot of EMR seats.  If we assume an EMR license goes for the ave price of $30K, that $25B buys us over 800K licenses.  Seeing as we have ~650K practicing physicians, we&#8217;ll have more than enough to go around.</p>
<p>And Vendors Win,<br />
You&#8217;re spot on, payers and vendors make out like bandits without some realignment of incentives for physicians.  Then there is the whole issue of whether or not HIT will make a damn bit of difference to escalating healthcare costs. Nominal impact at best.</p>
<p>But it sure is sexy to say things like healthcare IT, cloud computing and SOA!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vendors Win</title>
		<link>http://chilmarkresearch.com/2009/01/05/hit-part-of-stimulus-package-rumor-25b/#comment-1778</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vendors Win]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 18:31:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chilmarkresearch.com/?p=1041#comment-1778</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[LOL.. oops sorry that was Vendors. Hard to post via an iPhone.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL.. oops sorry that was Vendors. Hard to post via an iPhone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Verndos Win</title>
		<link>http://chilmarkresearch.com/2009/01/05/hit-part-of-stimulus-package-rumor-25b/#comment-1777</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Verndos Win]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 18:30:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chilmarkresearch.com/?p=1041#comment-1777</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Huge win for vendors that don&#039;t even share data with themselves yet. (if they all upgrade to the next version you have limited exchannge) Stanford, Kaiser and Palo Alto Medical all have the same vendor (Epic Systems of Madison privately held) and you have to print out the patients records and mail them to Stanford. (cancer patients)

25 billiion is 25,000 million so yes you can buy quite a bit of software. Using a recent quote of $50,000 per doctor you could provide software to 500,000 physicians. 

Of course there are no requriments that the savings from this huge investment will accrue to either patients or the doctors. Most of the savings will go to the insurance companies. Medicare already only has a 3% overhead so the EMR vendors and insurance companies just got the biggest windfall of their life.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Huge win for vendors that don&#8217;t even share data with themselves yet. (if they all upgrade to the next version you have limited exchannge) Stanford, Kaiser and Palo Alto Medical all have the same vendor (Epic Systems of Madison privately held) and you have to print out the patients records and mail them to Stanford. (cancer patients)</p>
<p>25 billiion is 25,000 million so yes you can buy quite a bit of software. Using a recent quote of $50,000 per doctor you could provide software to 500,000 physicians. </p>
<p>Of course there are no requriments that the savings from this huge investment will accrue to either patients or the doctors. Most of the savings will go to the insurance companies. Medicare already only has a 3% overhead so the EMR vendors and insurance companies just got the biggest windfall of their life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Burgess</title>
		<link>http://chilmarkresearch.com/2009/01/05/hit-part-of-stimulus-package-rumor-25b/#comment-1775</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alex Burgess]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 16:20:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chilmarkresearch.com/?p=1041#comment-1775</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[$25B doesn&#039;t buy much EMR...  I suppose that will support some more HIE/RHIO/Latest Acronym around the country, but I don&#039;t think that is enough to compel the hospitals/Priv Rights Folks to actually allow data sharing.  

Hopeful sign though.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>$25B doesn&#8217;t buy much EMR&#8230;  I suppose that will support some more HIE/RHIO/Latest Acronym around the country, but I don&#8217;t think that is enough to compel the hospitals/Priv Rights Folks to actually allow data sharing.  </p>
<p>Hopeful sign though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vince Kuraitis</title>
		<link>http://chilmarkresearch.com/2009/01/05/hit-part-of-stimulus-package-rumor-25b/#comment-1768</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vince Kuraitis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 01:16:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chilmarkresearch.com/?p=1041#comment-1768</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[....hmmm...&quot;$25 B&quot; was the exact amount recommended by HIIMSS.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;.hmmm&#8230;&#8221;$25 B&#8221; was the exact amount recommended by HIIMSS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

