<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Meaningful Use Draft is Tough to Swallow</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chilmarkresearch.com/2009/06/16/meaningful-use-draft-is-tough/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chilmarkresearch.com/2009/06/16/meaningful-use-draft-is-tough/</link>
	<description>Providing perspective on key IT trends in the healthcare sector</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 23:01:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#60;24hrs to Get Your Comments In &#171; Chilmark Research</title>
		<link>http://chilmarkresearch.com/2009/06/16/meaningful-use-draft-is-tough/#comment-3115</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[&#60;24hrs to Get Your Comments In &#171; Chilmark Research]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 22:40:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chilmarkresearch.com/?p=1720#comment-3115</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] by Chilmark Research on the topic of &#8220;meaningful use&#8221; (simply do a search) and we did a quick review on the recommendations last week if you need a [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] by Chilmark Research on the topic of &#8220;meaningful use&#8221; (simply do a search) and we did a quick review on the recommendations last week if you need a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Hansen</title>
		<link>http://chilmarkresearch.com/2009/06/16/meaningful-use-draft-is-tough/#comment-3067</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Hansen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 10:59:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chilmarkresearch.com/?p=1720#comment-3067</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Anything is possible with the right approach:
RE: CPOE
I could be wrong, but I think there are several vendors with a strong CPOE track record. Based on KLAS findings, there are three. As such, I have to believe they have found a &quot;process&quot; for adoption, somehow.

Physician adoption may prove a bit more challenging. But if the hospitals are willing to share the experience, at least with referring- and and hospital-employed-group practices, there may be a way for a percentage of these groups (don&#039;t know how large that audience is) to achieve adoption with relative ease. 

Would love to hear opinions.

Dan]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anything is possible with the right approach:<br />
RE: CPOE<br />
I could be wrong, but I think there are several vendors with a strong CPOE track record. Based on KLAS findings, there are three. As such, I have to believe they have found a &#8220;process&#8221; for adoption, somehow.</p>
<p>Physician adoption may prove a bit more challenging. But if the hospitals are willing to share the experience, at least with referring- and and hospital-employed-group practices, there may be a way for a percentage of these groups (don&#8217;t know how large that audience is) to achieve adoption with relative ease. </p>
<p>Would love to hear opinions.</p>
<p>Dan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: In praise of nay-sayers &#171; EMR-net</title>
		<link>http://chilmarkresearch.com/2009/06/16/meaningful-use-draft-is-tough/#comment-3064</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[In praise of nay-sayers &#171; EMR-net]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 02:01:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chilmarkresearch.com/?p=1720#comment-3064</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] be negative? Probably all or mostly contribution. A very good example of contribution is a post by Chilmark Research that both complements and critiques the [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] be negative? Probably all or mostly contribution. A very good example of contribution is a post by Chilmark Research that both complements and critiques the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CHIP Chimes In: Let&#8217;s Build an iPhone Platform for HIT &#171; Chilmark Research</title>
		<link>http://chilmarkresearch.com/2009/06/16/meaningful-use-draft-is-tough/#comment-3062</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CHIP Chimes In: Let&#8217;s Build an iPhone Platform for HIT &#171; Chilmark Research]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 21:35:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chilmarkresearch.com/?p=1720#comment-3062</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] release was serendepidous or not but timing is interesting in light of yesterday&#8217;s release of Draft Meaningful Use Recommendations and today&#8217;s webcast by CCHIT outlining future certification [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] release was serendepidous or not but timing is interesting in light of yesterday&#8217;s release of Draft Meaningful Use Recommendations and today&#8217;s webcast by CCHIT outlining future certification [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kel Mohror</title>
		<link>http://chilmarkresearch.com/2009/06/16/meaningful-use-draft-is-tough/#comment-3058</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kel Mohror]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 14:25:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chilmarkresearch.com/?p=1720#comment-3058</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How will the ad hoc call participants&#039; &quot;doable&quot; MU recommendations be organized, reconciled with each other, and be made simple &quot;action activities&quot; for providers of all types? (&quot;Simple&quot; as in not &quot;rocket science&quot; that providers will embrace, not shirk.)

Should this be the responsibility of the HIT Regional Extension Centers?

Your tweet brought me here. Thanks!

Kel]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How will the ad hoc call participants&#8217; &#8220;doable&#8221; MU recommendations be organized, reconciled with each other, and be made simple &#8220;action activities&#8221; for providers of all types? (&#8220;Simple&#8221; as in not &#8220;rocket science&#8221; that providers will embrace, not shirk.)</p>
<p>Should this be the responsibility of the HIT Regional Extension Centers?</p>
<p>Your tweet brought me here. Thanks!</p>
<p>Kel</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ICMCC Website - Articles &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Meaningful Use Draft is Tough too Swallow</title>
		<link>http://chilmarkresearch.com/2009/06/16/meaningful-use-draft-is-tough/#comment-3049</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ICMCC Website - Articles &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Meaningful Use Draft is Tough too Swallow]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 06:03:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chilmarkresearch.com/?p=1720#comment-3049</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Article John Moore, Chilmark Research, 16 June 2009 SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: &quot;Meaningful Use Draft is Tough too Swallow&quot;, url: &quot;http://articles.icmcc.org/2009/06/17/meaningful-use-draft-is-tough-too-swallow/&quot; }); [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Article John Moore, Chilmark Research, 16 June 2009 SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: &quot;Meaningful Use Draft is Tough too Swallow&quot;, url: &quot;<a href="http://articles.icmcc.org/2009/06/17/meaningful-use-draft-is-tough-too-swallow/&#038;quot" rel="nofollow">http://articles.icmcc.org/2009/06/17/meaningful-use-draft-is-tough-too-swallow/&#038;quot</a>; }); [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

